Hire Experts, Get Mad Skills Extra!
- January 22, 2016
- Posted by: WriteFers Editorial
- Categories: Competitive research, Innovation, Insights
A lot gets written about how building a great team is essential to building a great business! We’ve been corporate-conditioned with the idea of hiring full-time employees in all areas in need of competitive advantage – need world-class engineering talent? Hire full-time engineers! Want great marketing? Hire full-time marketers! Need exceptional financial advice? Hire a full-time finance team! The idea that hiring full-time employees (FTEs) for most functions or adding new staff for every unique need is the gold standard of business practices is obsolete.
Like all ever-changing ‘best practices’ of corporations, the practice of building an internal teams is also reversing its course.Trying new things is risky. And for internal managers, the benefits of consultants and agencies are overshadowed by threats, risks, and lost opportunities for career growth. Unfortunately, what’s better for the business isn’t always better for everyone in it.
Let’s address why it’s wiser to hire experts/consultants/agents and why we’ve made WriteFers a consulting/agency-biased organization.
![](https://writefers.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/Screen-Shot-2021-05-19-at-12.37.11-AM-p8klz7vivrvh3vqmp55pvxggrt91d9lesb4zkx9dk0.png)
Comparing Agencies & Consultants to Full-Time Employees
While it’s impossible to apply criteria for every business need universally, we urge you to use this comparison on a case-to-case basis!
1. Time: Efficiency/Productivity
Agencies
Productive work towards the project’s goal starts immediately. Time taken to understand your business and requirements is customarily covered in the proposal period.
FTEs
There’s often a lengthy ramp-up to even half-productivity.
Edge
There are ways to minimize both, but in most scenarios, consultants start faster and finish efficiently.
2. Total Cost
Agencies
Can be expensive – Retainer/Fee includes overheads like proposals that don’t convert, training for their teams, and on-demand availability. But for specific, well-structured deliverables, it’s hard to match the expertise that consultants/agencies offer.
FTEs
High variance. Except in the case of inexperienced talent in subprime locations, experienced, effective and efficient talent can cost more per month than an agency’s entire billing.
Edge
With so much range based on geography, experience, and choice of consultant, this one’s likely a tie.
3. Flexibility of Cost
Agencies
Firing one isn’t fun, but it’s generally straightforward and largely unemotional. What’s more, agencies and hirers often negotiate overwork/hours/projects and ramp up spending when required, an impossibility with FTEs.
FTEs
No matter how good you are at off-boarding, friction, emotions, and negative feelings are inevitable while letting go. FTEs believe that only severe events lead to downsizing. Layoffs (for performance or cost) are always ugly. Furthermore, there’s no way to ramp up or down without this pain — FTEs don’t give fractional time, nor can they take fractional pay.
Edge
Consultants
4. Emotional Resources Required
Agencies
Little emotional investment. A great client-agency relationship, by its very nature, tends to be professional and straightforward.
FTEs
Excellent people management encompasses bringing your emotions to work and leaning into complicated issues, conversations, and feelings.
Although emotional investments are natural and even necessary, they can get cost substantially in the investment calculus.
Edge
Consultants
5 Quality of Strategic Output
Agencies
For quick fixes, competent consultants who see dozens of similar problems every day contribute more rapidly & strategically. And so, they bill hundreds of dollars hourly.
FTEs
FTEs make a team of capable folks with the depth of knowledge around a particular business, making up for the lack of experience over a new, specific predicament.
Edge
Ideally, businesses need both types of resources: deep, internal knowledge combined with an agency’s perspective and expertise.
6. Replacement Time & Effort
Agencies
Switching between agencies is generally following exit clauses of the agreement.
FTEs
Firing and re-hiring for a role internally drain the organization’s resources. The stats are unfavorable: turnover costs average between 100-300% of the replaced employee’s salary, and ~8 months average for a new employee to pick up momentum.
Edge
Consultants. No question.
7. Paying for Deliverables vs. Time
Agencies
The model is exceptionally straightforward: money in exchange for deliverables.
FTEs
FTEs do not deliver as consistently as an agency. Except in core business areas where experienced employees have established pace & momentum, creating a flywheel effect, FTEs lack the tactical consistency an agency offers for newer deliverables or agendas.
Edge
Consultants are efficient, effective, and on a budget far more often than FTEs.
Limitations of Agencies/Consultants
Anti-agency sentiments come from those that believe that agencies/consultants could never be as ‘invested’ in the business as team members. However, we must also discuss the possibility of the inverse: agencies desperately want to deliver on their promises and keep organizations happy, but employees recognize that circumstances are more flexible.
We also have to account for how FTEs feel about hiring consultants. FTEs have to feel extremely secure about their abilities, value, and ties to the organization to feel optimistic about hiring experts on demand. FTEs present negative sentiments towards hiring consultants fearing diminished influence stunted career growth or reduced to performing mundane tasks.
On the flip side, when consultants perform poorly, FTEs are burdened additionally with cleaning up the mess. Organizations would have wasted capital that could have been invested in the existing team and would have also diminished the morale of FTEs.
How to Get the Best of Both Worlds
It is possible to eliminate most drawbacks of consultants. With intentional, strategic foresight early on, it is far easier to get the best of internal teams’ continuous focus AND outside agencies’ expertise and pay-for-performance model. Organizations have to :
1. Hire agencies early and often.
When FTEs get used to working with outside consultants, emotional issues (ownership of projects, trust in the team, and potential jealousy) quickly fade.
2. Contract for work that requires little to no maintenance.
Content projects, SEO, digital PR, email onboarding setup, and CRO, fit this bill flawlessly. So make one-time data purchases, market research, training, and many more.
3. Be willing to switch agencies/consultants if you’re disappointed.
Agencies come with low switching costs. But organizations doing this a lot, introspect! It might be about the clients, not the agencies. Setting reasonable deliverables, showing patience, and judging based on work quality/performance are crucial.
4. Aim for a culture where firing (or losing) FTEs isn’t seen as abnormal or failure.
Talk to folks you interview about this, talk about it regularly at internal meetings (“should we hire a consultant to do this, or do you have the bandwidth?”), don’t make it something you (or anyone you work with) fear.
And finally, read Liz Fosslien and Mollie West Duffy’s book, No Hard Feelings!
See how you can earn $27 in 7 minutes! Read here – https://bit.ly/32NSumo
$300-$500 Daily With Crypto – https://bit.ly/37Py4LO
This is the right site for anybody who wishes to find out about this topic. You understand a whole lot its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really will need toÖHaHa). You certainly put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for many years. Wonderful stuff, just great!
You ought to take part in a contest for one of the most useful blogs on the internet. I am going to highly recommend this web site!
Hi! I just wish to give you a huge thumbs up for the excellent info you have got here on this post. I will be coming back to your web site for more soon.
Excellent article. I definitely appreciate this site. Keep writing!
Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be interesting to read content from other writers and use something from other sites.